Identifier: pediatrics3189unse (find matches)
Title: Pediatrics.
Year: 1897 (1890s)
Authors:
Subjects: Pediatrics Children Infants Pediatrics Disease Disease
Publisher: New York : Van Publishing
Contributing Library: Columbia University Libraries
Digitizing Sponsor: National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH)

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
whichthis agent may be applied, I shall not attempt to decide forothers; the favorable judgment, however, of many whose goodopinion I value sustains me; and if my critic will kindlyallow me merely an individual opinion, I should say thatin this instance a psychologist and teacher had overshotthe mark, and that his regrets were superfluous. Sarcoma.—This case of sarcoma was under the care ofSurgeon-Major W. H. Burke, M.A., M.H., Assistant Civil Sur-geon, Sassom Hospital, Poona, India. The photograph was sentto us by Alfred Lingard, M.D., Imperial Bacteriologist,Muktesar, India. The patient was a youth, 17 years old. He was a millhand, and by accident his left arm was caught in machinery andtorn off. Amputation at the shoulder joint was done. Twelvemonths later the new growths were first noticed. They in-volved the left side of the face—the mouth, the antrum, theglands of the neck—later, the protrusion of the eyeball becamemarked, and finally the right antrum, etc., were affected.
Text Appearing After Image:
THE MODERN TREATMENT OF DIPHTHERIA, WITHREPORT OF CASES. By Arthur Mac Neal, A.B., M.D.,Benoyn, Illinois,and Ciiari.es W. Hkywood, A.B., M.D.,Riverside, Illinois. IT is lamentable that scientific physicians cannot seek truthwithout bias. The new treatment of diphtheria by anti-toxin has been fairly before the profession for more thantwo years. During this time many articles on the subject haveappeared in varioiis medical journals. Were one to collect andarrange these in book form he would have two volumes of aboutequal size and could thus tersely title each: Vol. I., For;Vol. II., Against. If he were to include the many ill-advisedarticles on antitoxin that have appeared in the secularpress he would be obliged to double the size of Vol. II. It issurprising how many physicians have been compelled from asense of duty to warn the public against the use of antitoxin.The truth is, antitoxin is lashed for many accidents it hasnot had the honor of causing. We forget many facts weshould remem

Note About Images